<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReTweeting: Attribution for Discovery versus Attribution for Creation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manas.tungare.name/blog/retweeting-attribution-for-discovery-versus-attribution-for-creation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manas.tungare.name/blog/retweeting-attribution-for-discovery-versus-attribution-for-creation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teo</title>
		<link>http://manas.tungare.name/blog/retweeting-attribution-for-discovery-versus-attribution-for-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-8909</link>
		<dc:creator>Teo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manas.tungare.name/blog/?p=443#comment-8909</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts =] A good middle way is to attribute only the last person that retweeted and the original author. I wish Twitter would have foreseen &#039;retweeting&#039; from the very beginning, and maybe also build the API accordingly. We know it&#039;s a retweet by the word &#039;RT&#039; but that began as a user convention, unlike &#039;@username&#039;, which is also a convention, but browser clients agree to build a link around it so you can click &#039;username&#039;. Basically, what i&#039;m saying is: why not make RT clickable as well? That could direct the user to the forest you were talking about, and maybe even navigate it interactively =]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts =] A good middle way is to attribute only the last person that retweeted and the original author. I wish Twitter would have foreseen &#8216;retweeting&#8217; from the very beginning, and maybe also build the API accordingly. We know it&#8217;s a retweet by the word &#8216;RT&#8217; but that began as a user convention, unlike &#8216;@username&#8217;, which is also a convention, but browser clients agree to build a link around it so you can click &#8216;username&#8217;. Basically, what i&#8217;m saying is: why not make RT clickable as well? That could direct the user to the forest you were talking about, and maybe even navigate it interactively =]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
